“Acting White”

Education Next Issue Cover

The social price paid by the best and brightest minority students


13 Comments | Print | PDF |

Winter 2006 / Vol. 6, No. 1

The social price paid by the best and brightest minority students

“Go into any inner-city neighborhood, and folks will tell you that government alone can’t teach kids to learn.They know that parents have to parent, that children can’t achieve unless we raise their expectations and turn off the television sets and eradicate the slander that says a black youth with a book is acting white.”
—Barack Obama, Keynote Address, Democratic National Convention, 2004

Acting white was once a label used by scholars, writing in obscure journals, to characterize academically inclined, but allegedly snobbish, minority students who were shunned by their peers.

Now that it has entered the national consciousness—perhaps even its conscience—the term has become a slippery, contentious phrase that is used to refer to a variety of unsavory social practices and attitudes and whose meaning is open to many interpretations, especially as to who is the perpetrator, who the victim.

I cannot, in the research presented here, disentangle all the elements in the dispute, but I can sort out some of its thicker threads. I can also be precise about what I mean by acting white: a set of social interactions in which minority adolescents who get good grades in school enjoy less social popularity than white students who do well academically.

My analysis confirms that acting white is a vexing reality within a subset of American schools. It does not allow me to say whose fault this is, the studious youngster or others in his peer group. But I do find that the way schools are structured affects the incidence of the acting-white phenomenon. The evidence indicates that the social disease, whatever its cause, is most prevalent in racially integrated public schools. It’s less of a problem in the private sector and in predominantly black public schools.

With findings as potentially controversial as these, one wants to be sure that they rest on a solid base. In this regard, I am fortunate that the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Adhealth) provides information on the friendship patterns of a nationally representative sample of more than 90,000 students, from 175 schools in 80 communities, who entered grades 7 through 12 in the 1994 school year. With this database, it is possible to move beyond both the more narrowly focused ethnographic studies and the potentially misleading national studies based on self-reported indicators of popularity that have so far guided the discussion of acting white.

The Meaning of the Phrase

Though not all scholars define acting white in precisely the same way, most definitions include a reference to situations where some minority adolescents ridicule their minority peers for engaging in behaviors perceived to be characteristic of whites. For example, when psychologist Angela Neal-Barnett in 1999 asked some focus-group students to identify acting-white behavior, they listed actions that ranged from speaking standard English and enrolling in an Advanced Placement or honors class to wearing clothes from the Gap or Abercrombie & Fitch (instead of Tommy Hilfiger or FUBU) and wearing shorts in winter!

Only some of these behaviors have a direct connection to academic engagement. However, as the remarks of Barack Obama, who would later win a seat in the United States Senate, suggest, it is the fact that reading a book or getting good grades might be perceived as acting white that makes the topic a matter of national concern. Indeed, negative peer-group pressure has emerged as a common explanation for the black-white achievement gap, a gap that cannot be explained away by differences in demographic characteristics alone. If minority students today deliberately underachieve in order to avoid social sanctions, that by itself could explain why the aca­demic performance of 17-year-old African Americans, as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), has deteriorated since the late 1980s, even while that of nine-year-olds has been improving. It may also help us understand the shortage of minority students in most elite colleges and universities.

Ethnography vs. Statistics

But is this well-publicized aspect of African American peer-culture reality or urban legend? Most ethnographers who examine school life in specific locations present acting white as a pervasive fact of high-school life for black adolescents. But the only two quantitative studies that analyze data from nationally representative samples of high-school students dismiss it altogether as cultural lore. My findings confirm the existence of acting white among blacks as well as among Hispanics, but offer important qualifications about its pervasiveness.

Although they did not coin the term (its origins are obscure), it was an ethnographic study by anthropologists Signithia Fordham and John Ogbu, published in the Urban Journal in 1986, that did the most to bring it to the attention of their fellow academics. Their “Capitol High,” a pseudonym for a predominantly black high school in a low-income area of Washington, D.C., had what the researchers said was an “oppositional culture” in which black youth dismissed academically oriented behavior as “white.”

In the late 1990s, Harvard University economist, Ron Ferguson, found much the same thing in quite another setting, an upper-class suburb of Cleveland, Ohio, called Shaker Heights. Although that city had been integrated for generations, large racial disparities in achievement persisted. When Ferguson detected an anti-intellectual culture among blacks in the local high school, Shaker Heights became virtually synonymous with the problem of acting white.

Fordham and Ogbu traced the roots of the “oppositional culture” to institutionalized racism within American society, which they contend led blacks to define academic achievement as the prerogative of whites and to invest themselves instead in alternative pursuits. Other observers, however, place the blame for acting white squarely on the shoulders of blacks. The Manhattan Institute’s John McWhorter, for example, contrasts African American youth culture with that of immigrants (including blacks from the Caribbean and Africa) who “haven’t sabotaged themselves through victimology.” These two theories, the former blaming acting white on a racist society, the latter on self-imposed cultural sabotage, have emerged as the predominant explanations for acting white among American blacks.

In fact, however, shunning the academic is hardly the exclusive prerogative of contemporary African American culture. James Coleman’s classic work The Adolescent Society, published in 1955, identified members of the sports teams and cheerleaders, not those on the honor role, as the most popular students in public schools. (See an excerpt from Coleman’s original Harvard Education Review article.) The former bring honor to the entire school, reasoned the University of Chicago sociologist; the latter, only to themselves. Since Coleman, ethnographers have found similar tensions between self-advancement and community integration. Indeed, variants on acting white have been spotted by ethnographers among the Buraku outcasts of Japan, Italian immigrants in Boston’s West End, the Maori of New Zealand, and the British working class, among others.

Even so, the question remains whether the tension that Coleman identified is more severe in some cultural contexts than others. On this topic, two sets of scholars weighed in with quantitative studies based on nationally representative surveys. Writing in 1998 in the American Sociological Review, James Ainsworth-Darnell of Georgia State University and Douglas Downey of Ohio State University reported that anti-intellectualism is no more severe a problem among black or Hispanic adolescents than it is among whites. Meanwhile, in a 1997 study, economists Phillip Cook of Duke and Jens Ludwig of Georgetown found that high-achieving black students are, if anything, even more popular relative to low-achieving peers than are high-achieving whites.

Of course, it is possible that the social rewards for achievement do not vary among ethnic groups in the United States. But both studies, each of which is based on data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS), have a common shortcoming in that they depend solely on a self-reported measure of personal popularity. The NELS contains a question that asks if the student “thinks others see him/her as popular.” The answer choices are: very, somewhat, or not at all. Unfortunately, when students are asked to judge their own popularity, they can be expected to provide a rosier scenario than is warranted.

New Data and Methods

Fortunately, the Adhealth data I used in this study allow me to measure popularity in a more subtle way. All the students surveyed were asked to list their closest male and female friends, up to five of each sex. I first counted how often each student’s name appeared on peers’ lists. I then adjusted these raw counts to reflect the fact that some friends count more than others. The more frequently a peer is listed by others, the more weight I assign to showing up on his or her list.

The advantage of this research strategy is that one never has to ask a student about his or her own popularity. Students’ natural tendency to brag, in this case by listing popular students as their friends, only gives us a more accurate picture of the school’s most desirable friends. Students listed as a friend by many peers who are themselves popular, rise to the top of the social hierarchy. Those who are listed by only a few peers, who in turn have few admitted friends, stand out as the marginal members of the community.

Armed with an objective measure of social status, I could examine more systematically whether or not the ethnographers were correct in identifying a distinctive acting-white phenomenon within African American communities. Do high-achieving minority students have fewer, less-popular friends than lower-achieving peers? How does this compare with the experience of white students?

I first report my findings using a measure of each student’s popularity within his or her own ethnic group, as that is the most direct test of the acting-white hypothesis. But as I explain below, I obtain the same set of results when I analyze the data without regard to the friends’ ethnicity.

I measure student achievement with a composite of grade-point average (GPA) based on student self-reports of their most recent grades in English, math, history/social studies, and science. When comparing the popularity of high- and low-achieving students, I compare students only with students who attend the same school, ensuring that the results are not skewed by unmeasured characteristics of specific schools. Even then, I take into account a number of factors, measured by the survey, that could affect popularity differently for students from different ethnic backgrounds. These factors include parental education and occupation and participation in various school activities, such as varsity sports, student government, and cheerleading.

Finally, to subject my findings to the strongest possible test, I adjust students’ popularity to reflect variation in self-reported effort in school. Recall that some types of acting-white theory say that students are penalized only for trying hard, not for achievement per se. The bright kid who can’t help but get good grades is not subjected to scorn. It’s the plodding rate busters with books constantly in their faces who are annoying. By adjusting for the effort students are putting into their studies, I do my best to separate the social consequences of achievement from those of effort to achieve.

New Evidence of Acting White

Even after taking into account many factors that affect student popularity, evidence remains strong that acting white is a genuine issue and worthy of Senator Obama’s attention. Figure 1, which plots the underlying relationship between popularity and achievement, shows large differences among whites, blacks, and Hispanics. At low GPAs, there is little difference among ethnic groups in the relationship between grades and popularity, and high-achieving blacks are actually more popular within their ethnic group than high-achieving whites are within theirs.  But when a student achieves a 2.5 GPA (an even mix of Bs and Cs), clear differences start to emerge.

As grades improve beyond this level, Hispanic students lose popularity at an alarming rate. Although African Americans with GPAs as high as 3.5 continue to have more friends than those with lower grades, the rate of increase is no longer as great as among white students.

The experience of black and white students diverges as GPAs climb above 3.5. As the GPAs of black students increase beyond this level, they tend to have fewer and fewer friends. A black student with a 4.0 has, on average, 1.5 fewer friends of the same ethnicity than a white student with the same GPA. Put differently, a black student with straight As is no more popular than a black student with a 2.9 GPA, but high-achieving whites are at the top of the popularity pyramid.

My findings with respect to Hispanics are even more discouraging. A Hispanic student with a 4.0 GPA is the least popular of all Hispanic students, and Hispanic-white differences among high achievers are the most extreme.

The social costs of a high GPA are most pronounced for adolescent males. Popularity begins to decrease at lower GPAs for young black men than young black women (3.25 GPA compared with a 3.5), and the rate at which males lose friends after this point is far greater. As a result, black male high achievers have notably fewer friends than do female ones. I observe a similar pattern among Hispanics, with males beginning to lose friends at lower GPAs and at a faster clip, though the male-female differences are not statistically significant.

Potential Objections

Could high-achieving minority students be more socially isolated simply because there are so few of them? The number of high-achieving minority students in the average school is fewer than the number of high-achieving white students. To see whether this disparity could explain my findings, I adjusted the data to eliminate the effect of differences in the number of students at each school with similar GPAs. This adjustment, however, did little to temper the effect of acting white.

It might also be hypothesized that high-achieving minority students are able to cultivate friendships with students of other ethnic groups. If so, I should obtain quite different results when I examine popularity among students of all ethnic groups. While one finds some evidence that high-achieving students are more popular among students of other ethnicities, the increment is not enough to offset the decline in popularity within their own ethnic group—a predictable finding, given that black and white students have only, on average, one friend of another ethnicity, and Hispanics just one and a half.

Indeed, when minority students reach the very highest levels of academic performance, even the number of cross-ethnic friendships declines. Black and Hispanic students with a GPA above 3.5 actually have fewer cross-ethnic friendships than those with lower grades, a finding that seems particularly troubling.

Finally, I examined whether high-achieving blacks and Hispanics can shield themselves from the costs of acting white by taking up extracurricular activities. There are many opportunities in schools for students to self-select into activities, including organized sports, cheerleading, student government, band, and the National Honor Society, that should put them in contact with students with similar interests.

Unfortunately, when I look separately at minority students who participate in each of these activities, I find only one within which ethnic differences are eliminated: the National Honor Society. Among students involved in every other activity, new friends made outside the classroom do not make up for the social penalties imposed for acting white.


A Private-School Edge

The patterns described thus far essentially characterize social dynamics of public-school students, who constitute 94 percent of the students in the Adhealth sample. For the small percentage of black and Hispanic students who attend private school, however, I find no evidence of a trade-off between popularity and achievement (see Figure 2). Surprisingly, white private-school students with the highest grades are not as popular as their lower-achieving peers. The most-popular white students in private schools have a GPA of roughly 2.0, a C average.

These data may help to explain one of the more puzzling findings in the research on the relative advantages of public and private schools. Most studies of academic achievement find little or no benefit of attending a private school for white students, but quite large benefits for African Americans. It may be that blacks attending private schools have quite a different peer group.

The Segregated School: Is It an Advantage?

I also find that acting white is unique to those schools where black students comprise less than 80 percent of the student population. In predominantly black schools, I find no evidence at all that getting good grades adversely affects students’ popularity.

But perhaps this changes when school desegregation leads to cross-ethnic friendships within the school. To see how the degree of internal integration within a school affects acting-white patterns, I calculated the difference from what I would expect in the total number of cross-ethnic friends in a school based on the ethnic make-up of the student body. Schools with a greater percentage of cross-ethnic friendships than expected are considered to be internally integrated. I divide schools into two groups of equal size: those with higher and lower degrees of internal integration.

Unfortunately, internal integration only aggravates the problem. Blacks in less-integrated schools (places with fewer than expected cross-ethnic friendships) encounter less of a trade-off between popularity and achievement. In fact, the effect of acting white on popularity appears to be twice as large in the more-integrated (racially mixed) schools as in the less-integrated ones. Among the highest achievers (3.5 GPA or higher), the differences are even more stark, with the effect of acting white almost five times as great in settings with more cross-ethnic friendships than expected. Black males in such schools fare the worst, penalized seven times as harshly as my estimate of the average effect of acting white on all black students!

This finding, along with the fact that I find no evidence of acting white in predominantly black schools, adds to the evidence of a “Shaker Heights” syndrome, in which racially integrated settings only reinforce pressures to toe the ethnic line.

In Search of an Answer

That acting white is more prevalent in schools with more interethnic contact hardly passes the test of political correctness. It nonetheless provides a clue to what is going on. Anthropologists have long observed that social groups seek to preserve their identity, an activity that accelerates when threats to internal cohesion intensify. Within a group, the more successful individuals can be expected to enhance the power and cohesion of the group as long as their loyalty is not in question. But if the group risks losing its most successful members to outsiders, then the group will seek to prevent the outflow. Cohesive yet threatened groups—the Amish, for example—are known for limiting their children’s education for fear that too much contact with the outside world risks the community’s survival.

In an achievement-based society where two groups, for historical reasons, achieve at noticeably different levels, the group with lower achievement levels is at risk of losing its most successful members, especially in situations where successful individuals have opportunities to establish contacts with outsiders. Over the long run, the group faces the danger that its most successful members will no longer identify with its interests, and group identity will itself erode. To forestall such erosion, groups may try to reinforce their identity by penalizing members for differentiating themselves from the group. The penalties are likely to increase whenever the threats to group cohesion intensify.

Applying this model of behavior to minority and white students yields two important predictions: A positive relationship between academic achievement and peer-group acceptance (popularity) will erode and turn negative, whenever the group as a whole has lower levels of achievement. And that erosion will be exacerbated in contexts that foster more interethnic contact. This, of course, is exactly what I found with regard to acting white.

Understanding acting white in this way places the concept within a broader conceptual framework that transcends specific cultural contexts and lifts the topic beyond pointless ideological exchanges. There is necessarily a trade-off between doing well and rejection by your peers when you come from a traditionally low-achieving group, especially when that group comes into contact with more outsiders.

Alternative Explanations

Such a conceptualization is preferable to both of the two theories that have so far dominated discussions of acting white: the notion of oppositional culture and the allegation of cultural self-sabotage.

The oppositional culture theory, developed by Fordham and Ogbu in the wake of their experiences at “Capitol High,” accounts for the observed differences between blacks and whites as follows: (1) white people provide blacks with inferior schooling and treat them differently in school; (2) by imposing a job ceiling, white people fail to reward blacks adequately for their academic achievement in adult life; and (3) black Americans develop coping devices which, in turn, further limit their striving for academic success. Fordham and Ogbu suggest the problem arose partly because white Americans traditionally refused to acknowledge that black Americans were capable of intellectual achievement and partly because black Americans subsequently began to doubt their own intellectual ability, began to define academic success as white people’s prerogative, and began to discourage their peers, perhaps unconsciously, from emulating white people in striving for academic success.

However plausible it sounds, the oppositional culture theory cannot explain why the acting-white problem is greatest in integrated settings. If Fordham and Ogbu were correct, the social sanctions for acting white should be most severe in places like the segregated school, where opportunities are most limited. The results of my studies, of course, point in precisely the opposite direction.

The notion that acting white is simply attributable to self-sabotage is even less persuasive. According to its proponents, black and Hispanic cultures are dysfunctional, punishing successful members of their group rather than rewarding their success. That theory is more a judgment than an explanation. A universal, it cannot explain the kinds of variations from one school setting to another that are so apparent in the data I have explored.

The Need for New Identities

How important are these social pressures? Although that story has yet to be fully told, in my view, the prevalence of acting white in schools with racially mixed student bodies suggests that social pressures could go a long way toward explaining the large racial and ethnic gaps in SAT scores, the underperformance of minorities in suburban schools, and the lack of adequate representation of blacks and Hispanics in elite colleges and universities.

Minority communities in the United States have yet to generate a large cadre of high achievers, a situation as discouraging as the high incarceration rates among minorities who never finish high school. In fact, the two patterns may be linked. As long as distressed communities provide minorities with their identities, the social costs of breaking free will remain high. To increase the likelihood that more can do so, society must find ways for these high achievers to thrive in settings where adverse social pressures are less intense. The integrated school, by itself, apparently cannot achieve that end.

Roland G. Fryer is assistant professor of economics, Harvard University and a faculty research fellow, the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Comment on this article
  • Jerrod Page says:

    How much of this is cultural, and how much is related to average racial IQ’s? When one race has an average IQ of 100 and the other 85 (and I’m referencing massive government and academic studies going back to WW I), a certain amount of scholastic underachievement has to be expected.

    I’m guessing that this is a politically incorrect observation, so we continue to have studies like this one which succeed only in dancing around the real issue.

  • […] Roland Fryer, Harvard economics professor, has found that black male high achievers have notably fewer friends in school than their peers. And Kennedy School education specialist Ronald Ferguson, who addressed the kids at Harvard (“Any place in the world that you’re interested in is where you’re supposed to be’’), has found that just the fear of being seen as acting white is enough to distort young people’s behaviors, including making them less willing to express a desire to excel academically. […]

  • Matthew Traylor says:

    @Jerrod, Those studies are incredibly biased, especially by means of IQ testing which are created using standards of white culture. Like for instance they test the African Pygmy tribe and found the average IQ to be 52. Well of course they did, they’re completely uneducated and live in a standard of living that hasn’t changed in hundreds perhaps thousands of years. Let us not forget that the government at that time also held the Syphilis experiments at the time, so I dont think we can use the government to reassure credibility at that time. So raced based IQ’s are nor only racially insensitive and justifying…..they’re also inaccurate and biased. Don’t let the system control you.

  • […] A recent study conducted by sociologists at Virginia Tech and Ohio State University validates what many parents understand – bullying can be particularly detrimental to high achieving Black and Latino students. An article detailing the study can be found here. In his 2006 study “An Empirical Study of ‘Acting White”, Harvard Economist Roland Fryer determined that being ostracized for “acting white” is most prevalent in racially integrated public schools and has the highest social costs for adolescent males of color. An article written by Fryer about his findings can be found here. […]

  • Isome says:

    “Here Fryer uses the Add Health data to demonstrate, in a nutshell, that the highest-achieving black students had fewer friends than high-achieving black students. In his study, black students with a 3.5 GPA had the most friends of all academic levels, those with a 4.0 had about as many friends as those with about a 3.0 and those with less than a 2.5 had the fewest friends of all.

    Overall, contrary to the study title, Fryer’s research clearly demonstrates that the “social price” paid by the lowest-achieving black students is far greater than the so-called price paid by the highest-achieving black students. Moreover, methodologically, the study has to make the ostensible leap that the number of friends a black student has is a direct measure and a consequence of acting white.”

  • BlackMan says:

    If I can say so ignorantly, I believe I can speak on this subject matter better than all the before posters. (1) I am actually Black, (2) My GPA in high school was 4.6, (3) I am the first African American to graduate from the IB program, one of the most prestigious educational programs in America.

    In other words, I was that intelligent Black student that this article is talking about. Absolutely it was–and still is– isolating being intelligent and Black. You are rejected immediately by your Black peers! But you also reject them. To put it simply, our interests and activities differ. And in the world of a pre-adult, these subtle differences is practically everything in life. If you are not watching the same things, care about the same things, then naturally you will clash. Growing up, while I enjoyed Nancy Drew book series, Hardy Boys book series, and classic books like Tale of Two Cities, ect. The other Black kids enjoyed watching wrestling, sports and playing videogames. We never had anything to speak about, and the things we did speak on were not fascinating to me.

    When I entered the IB program, I was the only African American there. It was just as isolating. I was accepted more in regards to being intelligent, but still there was a divide in socio-economics. Even though we shared the same interests, it was difficult for my counter-culture peers to understand why I couldn’t go out to the movies with them because I couldn’t afford it. Not just the movies, but anything that cost money. “Duh, your parents should pay, ” they would respond. I had to be more literal and inform them that when I said “I”, I meant my parents. Our differences further became apparent when they all had stories about the trips they took, their rich uncles, the family businesses, and brothers and sisters they had whom were attending college and working wonderful jobs. My reality was that my family was dirt poor, I lived in a very dangerous area, so much so that my older sister was stabbed to death on our front porch. Both my parents were on drugs, no one cooked my meals or my brothers’ meals, no one cleaned the house, no one earned money. I did all of those things, which means that no only did my family not have the money, not only did I not have the money, but I did not have the time either.

    I am happy studies like this exists, but it lacks ALOT when it comes to explaining what it means to be an educated Black person, particularly one who comes from poverty.

    Even still, keep up the work.

    As a break from the macabre, today I have been happily married for 13 years, I own both a Tech business and a non-profit that provides services for Foster youth. I have my Masters degree in Computer Science, joining the 0% of African Americans to achieve this goal. I am making preparations to start a program for a doctorate in Computer Science. I have no children, as I still make FAR FAR less than counter-cultures with the same credentials. But I am happy I took the road less traveled.

    guy who heard “Stop acting White almost as much as, ‘go back to Africa'”. None of these phrases deterred my determination.

  • Chinaman says:

    guy who heard “Stop acting White almost as much as, ‘go back to Africa’”

    should be: “Stop acting White” almost as much as, “go back to Africa”

    guy who hears variations on “Are you sure you’re Asian?” every other week

  • Whiteman says:

    Anti-intellectualism is a common trait that exists in many communities and a degree of relative isolation from peers is in my opinion is something that many highly intelligent people have to deal with. I grew up in a predominantly white small town and I was certainly teased in school by my white peers for being “nerdy” or a “kid genius”. Of course these people never considered me to be selling out my race by being smart. I came from an upper middle class family that was waspy and cerebral. Being intelligent and doing well academically was never seen as a deviation from my “roots”, rather, it was expected.

    But it is important to remember that whites are not monolithic or homogeneous. The proverbial “white person” that we common see stereotyped usually refers to the culture of middle to upper middle class suburbanite (mostly northern) white communities. When minority peers accuse someone of “acting white” they are usually referring to this brand of white person rather than Appalachian hillbillies or Italians from the Bronx.

    There are numerous subgroups and cultural identities within white America, some of which are quite hostile to intellectualism. For example, in the small town that I grew up, many people identified themselves as “rednecks” or “country people” (aka, traditional rural white culture), a cultural identity that is hardly cerebral or characterized by academic achievement. A highly intelligent academically inclined person would have a very hard time gaining acceptance as a “redneck”. And indeed, growing up I knew many people who suppressed their academic orientations to better fit the “redneck” profile and gain acceptance within their peer group.

    A high achieving student also tends to have a hard time gaining acceptance among “jock” culture as well since these are commonly regarded as incompatible traits. The “guido” white subculture portrayed on shows like Jersey Shore does not seem to be terribly welcoming to intellectualism either.

    I think there do exist numerous types of identities and subcultures within white America which view intellectualism and academic achievement as something that is foreign and perhaps suspect as well. A highly intelligent or academically inclined person could easily feel isolated and estranged among these sub-cultures.

    Now I’m not trying to argue that the average intelligent child from the Ozarks deals with a level of adversity equal to what a highly intelligent African American person has to go through. However I do think it is worth mentioning that anti-intellectualism and accusations of “selling out” your people by being academically inclined is not something unique to minorities, and that there are numerous cultural identities within white America that are viewed as incompatible with high intelligence and academic achievement.

    Unfortunately the stereotypical “black person” found in our culture tends to be the opposite of the stereotypical “white person”. They are often characterized as uneducated and poor. This is unfortunate as while the “white guy” stereotype tends to inflate the image of whites as perhaps being more mainstream and successful than they actually are, the common stereotype of blacks tend to deflate their image and make them appear more anti-intellectual and averse to achievement than what is actually the case.

    These stereotypes are especially significant with adolescents, as the search for a social identity is of a highest priority to people of that age group. As an adult, it is easy to look at the social divisions that exist in high school politics as silly and overly vacant. But to a teenager these are things of prime importance, to the degree that many teenagers may even engage in behaviors that are harmful to their overall well being and life goals if it means gaining acceptance into a group. It is also the case that one’s academic performance during their formative adolescent years will be greatly determinative of where they will go in life. An intelligent person who adopts too much of a toxic identity during these years can be creating long term adverse consequences for their ability to succeed. I have seen many smart people of all races and backgrounds fall into this trap.

    In my life experience I certainly have dealt with the feeling of relative isolation from my peers that all intelligent people do. Had I been born into a family that identified itself with a subculture such as “rednecks” or “guidos” I probably would have been even more isolated. But the family I was born into fit squarely into the stereotypical “white people” of our culture, and while being smart certainly got me teased at times, I was never accused of selling out my people or “not being a true white person”. Rather, being an academically oriented nerdy white kid was my identity, and was expected of me by society. While I was not always comfortable with my surroundings, I was always comfortable in my own skin.

    I feel terrible for members of minority groups who are ostracized by their peers simply for being themselves. I have many good friends and professional peers who had to deal with accusations of “acting too white” or “not really being black” while growing up. But in getting to know them, it is obvious to me that these people are not “acting” or “pretending” to be anything at all. Rather, they are simply being themselves and acting like the individuals they are. The fact that they may have traits commonly stereotyped as “white” should not make their personal or ethnic identity false or illegitimate in any way. I hope that some day we as a society can get beyond the pettiness that cultural and racial identities can generate and learn to accept individual differences, even if these individual differences defy commonly accepted stereotypes.

  • Offie Wortham, PhD says:

    I was raised in a city in Westchester County, NY. and I am a person-of-color who was called Negro or colored when I was growing up. I graduated from high school in 1956. Our school system was around 7-10% Black. I never saw a Black teacher, doctor, lawyer, social worker, or engineer until I went to college. Socially, all of my friends were Black. There was no interracial dating or socializing in our time. My Black friends and I were the class presidents, captains of the baseball, football, track, and basketball teams. We were also the leaders in student government and honor societies. No one ever said that we were “acting White.” We all went off to Harvard, Vassar, Princeton, Antioch, Oberlin, Johns Hopkins, and NYU. There were two distinct classes in our city, and race had nothing to do with it. Today, my grandchildren are living in White communities in the suburbs and they are under pressure from lower-class Blacks who say they are “acting White” when they get good grades. I just hope that we will start using some community psychology nationwide to reverse this negative trend.

  • Salvatore Lugo says:

    Very simular dynamics to Italian Americans; although this was a more pronounced phenomenon in earlier years, when Caucasians did not consider Italians “white”.

    There is a term for “acting white” used by Italian Americans: “medicone” which actual traces it’s root word to the Italian word “Americano”….an Italian whom acts “white”, is studious, changes speech patterns, marry blonde hair and fair skinned partners to “whiten their genealogy”, shuns other Italians, etc. are called and looked down by other Italian Americans.

  • David Bridges says:

    Hey Offie, I’m familiar with Westchester County, N.Y. Were you raised in Mt. Vernon?

  • Theodora Weston says:

    I am white, female, highly intelligent, from a middle class low-achieving background, performed poorly academically growing up due to unsupportive family environment and sub-par schools, but made it on my own into a top private women’s college through a special program, where I excelled (for that reason, I support women’s colleges, black colleges, charter schools and school choice, including vouchers, because the right or wrong school can make or break a person’s success in life). I’m also introspective and studious, a constant reader of tomes to keep up with my field, with no interest in sports, sitcoms, hair and makeup, the latest sensation, whatever it is most people seem to get excited about (studies like the one in this article should also consider temperament, a big factor in how many friends people may have – not everyone is an extrovert).

    I’ve never had many friends, am a bit of a loner, though sometimes feel lonely because there are few people whom I can talk to about the things that really interest me, in the way I like to talk. With most people, if I try, I lose them! I’ve endured all my life the assumption that, being small, quiet and female, I’m not very intelligent and have nothing to say (and endured expressions of surprise when they find out I actually am smart and have a lot to say), and as I’ve grown older endured ageism, the assumption that since I’m older (and female) I have nothing to say, because young people are “where it’s at”(and endured expressions of surprise from young people who say hanging out with me is like hanging out with someone their own age – because I’m curious, open and articulate about everything!). In more recent years, as a convert to Catholicism I’ve endured anti-Catholicism, and as a convert to conservatism have endured being labeled a Nazi, terrorist and bigot (though not by anyone who actually knows me).

    My attitude to all of it is: I don’t care what others think of me. I do what I love and feel called to, believe what I sincerely believe, and share it with whoever will listen. I get up and get going again after every setback, create opportunities, approach the places I want to work, and develop relationships though good attitude and generous service that has opened doors widely and surprisingly, in a specialized field typically dominated by male intellectuals. I don’t complain, threaten, cry victim or accuse of sexism or ageism, or allow myself to become bitter, but treat everyone well, do my work and let the quality of my work speak for itself. And it works.

    That’s what we should be teaching young people: who cares what others think of you? Be true to what you believe, do what you love, work hard at it, get good at it, and show it to those who can open doors for you. For every person who closes a door to you, there’s world of others of all colors and both sexes who will open doors to you, if you don’t give up. Young people need encouragement and even exhortation, not victimology and hand-wringing. Everyone has to put up with garbage and setbacks in life, regardless of who you are – including white males, most of whom are anything but “privileged.” Just ask my husband. It’s getting up and keeping going according to your convictions that gets you places, and ensures your own self-respect, regardless of what others may think.

  • John Lindsay says:

    What this article “FORGETS” is….African- and Latino/a-Americans did NOT coin the terms “braniac, computer who wore gym shoes(a movie, too), nerd, etc.”

    Just like “acting White,” they are used to putdown those who are studious about learning.
    Thus, Whites have NO RIGHT to criticize anyone using the phrase, “acting White.”

    Acting White….primarily refers to those Students of Color who are FORCED to ONLY learn about Whites’ accomplishments, contributions, inventions, literary figures/literature, etc., in school.

    Hence, it is the fault of Whites that such a term arose in the first place.
    They racistly EXCLUDED teaching about the accomplishments, contributions, inventions, literary figures/literature, etc., etc., etc….of People of Color(African-, Asian- & Latino/a-Americans and Native “Americans”).

    This information should be WOVEN into the fabric of EVERY class….NOT set aside into one month, such as Black History Month, Latino/a History Month, etc., etc., etc.
    If such information was included, the term “acting White” would no longer be used.

    TONS and tons of educational research demonstrates students are MUCH more engaged when they can see themselves in what they’re studying.

    Additionally, educational researchers have identified 7 different learning styles.
    However, the overwhelming majority of schools in the U.S. continue to utilize a one-teaching-style-fits-all approach….the one most favored by the White middle class.
    Hence, the stats in the article MEAN NOTHING….but instead reflect the “level of resistance” to ONLY learning about White cultural productions.
    Yet, White researchers view this as a deficit rather than “level of resistance”….but that’s what happens when ONLY one cultural-based perspective and/or analytical viewpoint is utilized to evaluate educational attainment or lack of it.

    When my parents purchased the 4 volumes of “Ebony Pictorial History of Black America” (1973), my reading went “through the roof.”
    This “appetite” significantly increased my vocabulary spelling, etc., skills.
    I soon started to get a 100 on every spelling test, and I did much better in other classes, too….resulting in me being assigned to the highest track.

    The problem isn’t an “achievement gap”….but indeed a “teaching gap.”

    It’s little wonder that the “African American” category(and most likely the same would happen for categories for other People of Color) on the game-show “Jeopardy” is always the last one chosen….because Whites know next-to-nothing about the accomplishments, contributions, inventions, literary figures/literature, etc., produced by People of Color.
    Hence, I have NO REVERENCE for any of the so-called “Jeopardy Champions”….because they only know about White cultural productions. : < (



  • Comment on this Article

    Name ()


    Sponsored Results

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform