Aftershocks from DC’s Mayoral Election



By 09/17/2010

1 Comment | Print | NO PDF |

(This post also appears on Rick Hess Straight Up.)

It’s Friday and it’s been a long week, so I’ll cut to the chase. Four things worth noting about the aftermath of Mayor Adrian Fenty’s defeat in D.C. on Tuesday.

First, the poaching is already on for the phenomenal staff that Michelle Rhee recruited to D.C. Assuming that Rhee is leaving, sharp-eyed talent hawks across the land are already contacting her team members. Unless they turn down the outstretched hands en masse, this doesn’t bode well for a transition. This means that it would behoove mayor-in-waiting Vincent Gray to move quickly on the leadership question, and to make it clear that he truly is committed to continuing Rhee’s transformational efforts–or a new leader will find the DCPS cupboard picked over, and be forced to start from square one. More practically, if you’re running an outfit that’s hungry for talent and want a shot at folks in DCPS, you’d do well to start working the phones sooner rather than later.

Second, the word is that at least a few member of the D.C. City Council are floating a compromise which would have Rhee stay through 2011-12, to ease any transition. I don’t think that’s likely to get much traction. It would render her a lame duck and rob her of much of her effectiveness even as it denies Gray his chance to transition to more “inclusive” reform. Knowing Rhee a little bit and knowing how these things work, I think it’s safe to surmise that either Gray will be convinced by advisors that losing her would be devastating setback for his tenure–or that she’ll go where her talents are welcome.

Third, a fascinating twist to all of this may be that Rhee’s defeat–and the defeat of three like-minded reformers running for the New York legislature–may start to convince a larger number of would-be reformers that no one can really change dysfunctional school systems as they exist. They may figure, “If Rhee couldn’t do it, we need a whole new playbook.” This will ramp up efforts by outfits like ConnCAN to get serious about the political ground game. With any luck, it may also start to wean more than a few would-be reformers from their affection for weak brews like mayoral control and merit pay and towards more muscular efforts to dismantle, rethink, or bypass familiar schools and systems. (These are just the kind of folks I’m addressing in my forthcoming book The Same Thing Over and Over: How School Reformers Get Stuck in Yesterday’s Ideas, which is due out in November).

Finally, like the warrior she is, Michelle seems intent on going out on her shield. No stutter-stepping or pablum. As she said on Wednesday at Washington’s Newseum, “Yesterday’s election results were devastating–devastating. Not for me, I will be fine. Not for Fenty, he will be fine, too. It was devastating for the children of Washington, D.C.” She continued, “The biggest tragedy is the lesson we should take from this is to pull back. We cannot retreat now in anything…. Now is the time to lean forward and be more aggressive and more adamant.” Damn straight. And my hope is that Michelle is right now plotting with funders, allies, and supporters who will put her in a position to lead just such an effort. I can’t think of anyone better suited for it.




Comment on this article
  • Dean says:

    It is now time to conclude that right wing school reform is totally impossible and ought to be abandoned. The suburbs where conservatives and Republicans have at least a chance, have great public schools. The inner cities reject the Michelle Rhee approach and favour liberal Democrts who notwithstanding Dfer, will basically opt for the PS System.

    It is time to do the only thing that has any chance of improving schools, mitigate poverty by heavily taxing rich people, spending all of the money on services to poor people and becoming a kind of European social democracy.

    Anything else looks like King Knute attempting to hold back the tides.

  • Comment on this Article

    Name ()


    *

         1 Comment
    Sponsored Results
    Sponsors

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform

    Sponsors