Arne Duncan’s Planned Speech Shows Obama Administration Slowly Wading into NCLB



By 09/24/2009

1 Comment | Print | NO PDF |

Eight months into the Obama administration, the White House has been mute on its intentions regarding the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) act, George W. Bush’s signature education accomplishment—and a statute that nearly everyone in America believes needs a makeover. Of course there’s no consensus as to what that makeover should look like—one reason that Messrs. Obama, Duncan, et al have been avoiding it, even though the 2001 statute is already two years overdue for reauthorization. The bipartisan team that Bush 43 assembled behind this measure on Capitol Hill is long gone and the Obama team has been plenty busy with other matters. In a speech today , Secretary Duncan makes clear that he’s in no hurry to dive deep into NCLB. He’s inviting more input and advice as to how to set it right. (Never mind that there’s already a five-foot shelf of books and studies regarding NCLB’s shortcomings and needed repairs.) But he is sticking a toe into these turbid waters, aligning himself with the goals of this contentious statute and declaring that we must use its current tools—including standardized testing—until we develop better ones. He tipped his hand a bit more when he declared—correctly, in my view—that “we should be tighter on the goals… but…looser on the means for meeting those goals.” Translation: America needs national standards and measures but should leave it to states and districts to operate their own schools. The former is apt to draw catcalls from the GOP side of the aisle while the latter will alarm his fellow Democrats. Mr. Duncan and the President face plenty of heavy lifting on this front—whenever they get serious about it.

This commentary is also posted at the National Review Online’s “The Corner” blog.




Comment on this article
  • George Mitchell says:

    Checker states:

    “But he is sticking a toe into these turbid waters, aligning himself with the goals of this contentious statute and declaring that we must use its current tools—including standardized testing—until we develop better ones.”

    Here I need clarification. Does NCLB actually require standardized tests or has it rather spurred the use of state-by-state criterion-reference tests? My understanding is that NCLB encouraged a race to the bottom among individual states when they were allowed/required to develop their own tests and to measure “proficiency” by whatever standard they chose. These tests, I thought, had crowded out standardized tests, which I define as tests where scores are presented based on how a student compares to a representative national sample.

  • Comment on this Article

    Name ()


    *

         1 Comment
    Sponsored Results
    Sponsors

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform

    Sponsors