I Ain’t Talking to You If You Ain’t Talking About Structural Reform

By 02/10/2016 0 Comments

In a compelling recent blog post, Nathan Gibbs-Bowling warned that, as Washington State’s new Teacher of the Year, he won’t be taking positions on most of the hot policy topics of the day (Common Core, charter schools, etc.). Rather, Nate, who teaches at a highly successful school-within-a-school for at-risk high school students in Tacoma, said he wants to use his new bully pulpit to talk about the only things that really matter: the resource inequities that lead to the kinds of horrific conditions we’re seeing in photos of Detroit public schools and the need for more high-quality and diverse teachers. Not one to mince words, he wrote: “If you ain’t talking about the teacher in the classroom, I ain’t listening.”

Nathan Gibbs-Bowling, the Teacher of the Year for Washington State, is  pictured  here at an award ceremony for the Milken Educator Award, which he won in 2013. (Photo Credit: Milken Family Foundation)

Nathan Gibbs-Bowling, the Teacher of the Year for Washington state, is pictured here receiving an earlier award, the Milken Educator Award. (Photo Credit: Milken Family Foundation)

The blog post was roundly applauded and shared widely by people across the political and policy spectrum. It struck a nerve and for good reason: it’s too easy to lose sight of the root causes of educational inequities. As research has shown ad naseum, there is no more important influence on student outcomes than the teacher-student interaction.

I read Nate’s post the day before we opened our annual Portfolio Network meeting, a meeting focused on all kinds of policy discussions that Nate might refuse to talk about: moving autonomy and funding to the school level, unifying enrollment systems to ensure equal access across district and charter schools, replacing or turning around low-performing schools. But here’s why he should:

At CRPE, we believe that the structure of today’s public school systems make strong, equitable schools and excellent teaching at scale nearly impossible. Urban school systems hardwire the inequalities that Nate talks about and create conditions that make it extremely difficult to attract, retain, and develop the teachers our kids need. The way we distribute funds and staff to schools ensures that the most talented teachers end up working with more advantaged students. One-size-fits-all professional development, maddening bureaucracy, and weak leadership discourage great teachers and principals from working in big urban districts. Interest group politics prevent us from replacing ineffective teachers and schools. In the name of “sameness” we undermine true equity and excellence.

The portfolio mindset is not about “nibbling around the edges,” it is about attacking those policy barriers head on so great teachers like Nate can do great work. In order to achieve true equity for all students,

• educators and schools, not central office staff, must be the locus of decision making and accountability;
• dollars must follow students out of the central office and into classrooms on a per student basis;
• the primary job of government has to be ensuring that every child in every neighborhood has a range of good schooling options;
• parents and teachers have to be able to opt-in to schools that are a good fit, not be assigned.

The goal is pragmatic and blessedly non-ideological: to move ALL of a city’s public schools forward, whatever it takes. The portfolio strategy calls for being committed to results and recognizing that the challenges in our cities are too great to be fighting over district or charter. They are too great to think that 50 or even 500 smart people in a central office can find all the solutions. They are too great to let adult interest politics win over what’s best for students.

But these conditions do require serious policy debates: How do you create meaningful autonomies for schools with or without charter statutes? How do you convince central offices to move money to schools? How do you meaningfully engage teachers unions and communities in the need to replace ineffective schools and staff? Those are some of the tough topics we tackled at our portfolio meeting last week with community, district, and charter leaders and mayors’ staff from more than 20 cities.

So while Nate is absolutely correct that nothing in a student’s schooling experience trumps strong teachers, there is also a real danger to his message. It implies that the only policies that teachers should concern themselves with are those that are directly focused on things like teacher preparation, increasing the pipeline of high-quality teachers of color, etc. The portfolio strategy is not a distraction from discussions about supporting great teachers and advancing equity. It is a necessity.

– Robin Lake

This first appeared on the Lens, the blog of the Center for Reinventing Public Education.

Scapegoating Sports

By 02/10/2016 0 Comments

Brookings fellow Michael Hansen has a piece blaming high school sports for distracting public schools from their mission.

James Coleman, the “Equality of Opportunity” Study, and School Choice

By 02/10/2016 0 Comments

Coleman’s work spawned a large body of research comparing the effectiveness of district, private, and (later) charter schools in preparing students for college and life. A new article reviews that research.

Behind the Headline: The Math Revolution

By 02/09/2016 0 Comments

In this month’s Atlantic, Peg Tyre writes about the remarkable number of American students performing at extremely high levels in math and looks at how they got there.

How Should States Measure School Success?

By 02/08/2016 0 Comments

Most of today’s K–12 accountability systems are, themselves, persistently underperforming.

Behind the Headline: Teach for America Celebrates 25th Anniversary at Washington Event

By 02/08/2016 0 Comments

Teach for America celebrated its 25th anniversary with a conference in Washington, D.C. attended by thousands of alumni of the program.

3 Reactions to Our Teacher Prep Reports

By 02/08/2016 0 Comments

Our report, which finds that we don’t actually know very much about how to prepare teachers or help them improve, has generated a lot of feedback.

The Educational Freedom Legacy of Andrew Coulson

Early yesterday morning, after a fifteen month battle with brain cancer, Cato Institute Senior Fellow in Education Policy Andrew Coulson passed away.

Teach for America Recognizes Teachers Need Portable Benefits

By 02/05/2016 0 Comments

Teach for America celebrates its 25th anniversary this year. An increasing number of alumni are staying in the classroom, and the organization has adopted new policies to recognize this.

Behind the Headline: Nation’s Charter Schools Aren’t Growing As Fast As Once Thought

By 02/04/2016 0 Comments

Charter schools now enroll 2.9 million students, up 9% from last year, according to a new report from the National Alliance of Public Charter Schools described in the Washington Post.

Posts by Authors

  • Mark Bauerlein
  • John Chubb
  • Martha Derthick
  • A. Graham Down
  • Joshua Dunn
  • Education Next
  • Williamson Evers
  • Chester E. Finn, Jr.
  • Jay P. Greene
  • James Guthrie
  • Eric Hanushek
  • Bryan Hassel
  • Emily Ayscue Hassel
  • Frederick Hess
  • Paul Hill
  • Michael Horn
  • William Howell
  • Marci Kanstoroom
  • Peter Meyer
  • George Mitchell
  • Paul E. Peterson
  • Michael Petrilli
  • Michael Podgursky
  • Andy Smarick
  • Bill Tucker
  • Herbert Walberg
  • Martin West
  • Blogs

  • Organizations

    Sponsored Results
    About the Blog

    The Ed Next blog aims to provide lively commentary on education news and research and to bring evidence to bear on current education policy debates.

    Our bloggers include editors at Education Next magazine and others who have written for the magazine. Education Next is a quarterly journal of opinion and research about education policy published by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, and additionally sponsored by the Program on Education Policy and Governance at Harvard University and the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

    The opinions expressed by the Ed Next bloggers and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of Educationnext.org, Education Next magazine, or its sponsors. Educationnext.org is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the bloggers.


    Sponsors

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform

    Sponsors