<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost Opportunities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/</link>
	<description>Education Next is a journal of opinion and research about education policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-80862</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://content.hks.harvard.edu/educationnext/?p=49626482#comment-80862</guid>
		<description>[...] back into a horrible and failed system and lose the massive success their voucher program was.  http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/      The reading skills significantly improved each year of the program. This program proved that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back into a horrible and failed system and lose the massive success their voucher program was.  <a href="http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/" rel="nofollow">http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/</a>      The reading skills significantly improved each year of the program. This program proved that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.C. Vouchers &#8211; Just Another Congressional Plaything</title>
		<link>http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-61340</link>
		<dc:creator>D.C. Vouchers &#8211; Just Another Congressional Plaything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://content.hks.harvard.edu/educationnext/?p=49626482#comment-61340</guid>
		<description>[...] imposing his will on my access to locally funded health care programs. Or thank the Democrats for taking away the voucher program in 2009. In fact, the only thing I will thank Congress for is if they give me a real vote on how to spend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] imposing his will on my access to locally funded health care programs. Or thank the Democrats for taking away the voucher program in 2009. In fact, the only thing I will thank Congress for is if they give me a real vote on how to spend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrats to Poor Schoolchildren: &#8220;No Good Education for You!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrats to Poor Schoolchildren: &#8220;No Good Education for You!&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://content.hks.harvard.edu/educationnext/?p=49626482#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>[...] or lacked tangible positive results. The OSP was wildly successful. Students in the program were getting a much better education, they were happier, and their parents were happier. The amount Washington spent on the program, up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or lacked tangible positive results. The OSP was wildly successful. Students in the program were getting a much better education, they were happier, and their parents were happier. The amount Washington spent on the program, up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Education Next</title>
		<link>http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Education Next</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://content.hks.harvard.edu/educationnext/?p=49626482#comment-947</guid>
		<description>The following was submitted as a letter to the editor:

I applaud Professor Patrick Wolf for his excellent review of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP) (“Lost Opportunities,” research, Fall 2009). Three of Professor Wolf’s main points warrant further amplification.

First, the evidence is clear and unequivocal that the program is working for the children and families who participate in it. Professor Wolf methodically dissects the evaluation conducted by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) and notes that the program improved the reading achievement of the treatment group students overall across all subgroups examined. Importantly, the evaluation suggests that such gains will continue over time. While it is true that there were no statistical gains in math achievement found for the treatment group, it must also be noted that the review covered a three-year period compatible with the program’s infancy. It is reasonable to project that the longer a student is in the OSP, the more benefit will be realized in all academic areas.

Second, Professor Wolf points out how striking the OSP’s achievement results are when compared to the results of other programs. According to Wolf, only 3 of the 11 experimental evaluations conducted by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE) at IES have demonstrated statistically significant achievement impacts overall in either reading or math. The reading impact of the OSP is the largest achievement impact yet reported in an evaluation overseen by the NCEE. This finding is extraordinary.

Finally, in discussing the OSP’s impact on expanding school choice for parents, Professor Wolf relates that approximately 81 percent of parents placed their child in a private or public school of choice three years after winning the scholarship lottery, as did 46 percent of those who lost the lottery. He points out the high level of satisfaction with the program among parents. District parents are becoming more sophisticated about education options for their children, and they are sharing their knowledge with their neighbors and friends. The OSP, along with the successful D.C. charter school experiment, has created an atmosphere of receptivity for changing how we view K–12 education in our nation’s capital.

Kevin P. Chavous
Distinguished Fellow
Center for Education Reform</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following was submitted as a letter to the editor:</p>
<p>I applaud Professor Patrick Wolf for his excellent review of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP) (“Lost Opportunities,” research, Fall 2009). Three of Professor Wolf’s main points warrant further amplification.</p>
<p>First, the evidence is clear and unequivocal that the program is working for the children and families who participate in it. Professor Wolf methodically dissects the evaluation conducted by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) and notes that the program improved the reading achievement of the treatment group students overall across all subgroups examined. Importantly, the evaluation suggests that such gains will continue over time. While it is true that there were no statistical gains in math achievement found for the treatment group, it must also be noted that the review covered a three-year period compatible with the program’s infancy. It is reasonable to project that the longer a student is in the OSP, the more benefit will be realized in all academic areas.</p>
<p>Second, Professor Wolf points out how striking the OSP’s achievement results are when compared to the results of other programs. According to Wolf, only 3 of the 11 experimental evaluations conducted by the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE) at IES have demonstrated statistically significant achievement impacts overall in either reading or math. The reading impact of the OSP is the largest achievement impact yet reported in an evaluation overseen by the NCEE. This finding is extraordinary.</p>
<p>Finally, in discussing the OSP’s impact on expanding school choice for parents, Professor Wolf relates that approximately 81 percent of parents placed their child in a private or public school of choice three years after winning the scholarship lottery, as did 46 percent of those who lost the lottery. He points out the high level of satisfaction with the program among parents. District parents are becoming more sophisticated about education options for their children, and they are sharing their knowledge with their neighbors and friends. The OSP, along with the successful D.C. charter school experiment, has created an atmosphere of receptivity for changing how we view K–12 education in our nation’s capital.</p>
<p>Kevin P. Chavous<br />
Distinguished Fellow<br />
Center for Education Reform</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back to School &#124; Conservative Young Professionals of Milwaukee</title>
		<link>http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Back to School &#124; Conservative Young Professionals of Milwaukee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://content.hks.harvard.edu/educationnext/?p=49626482#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] programs have been successful in areas where they have been tried and have been used to give opportunities to groups that may [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] programs have been successful in areas where they have been tried and have been used to give opportunities to groups that may [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Educational ChoiceWorks!</title>
		<link>http://educationnext.org/lost-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Educational ChoiceWorks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://content.hks.harvard.edu/educationnext/?p=49626482#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] Sen. Kennedy was wrong.&#160; Patrick J. Wolf of the University of Arkansas explains: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sen. Kennedy was wrong.&nbsp; Patrick J. Wolf of the University of Arkansas explains: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

