Mathews on Saving Schools



By 08/24/2010

1 Comment | Print | NO PDF |

In his commentary on my book, Saving Schools: From Horace Mann to Virtual Learning, Jay Mathews doubts that he will find any time soon “something of the new electronic era that significantly increases achievement in reading and writing for all kids.”

Phrased that way, he is undoubtedly correct, as nothing makes things better for every single person, regardless of the stated aspirations of No Child Left Behind.

And I agree with Mathews that the first adopters of virtual learning will be those resourceful students bored in today’s high schools, who will be eager to access the very best educational material available on line—just as soon as states provide funding to those who create good courses that can be applied to high school transcripts, regardless of whether they are taken in a district-run high school or in an online environment.

That is the secret to the success of Florida Virtual School, a state-run high school that offers alternatives to local district courses that any student in Florida may take.  If other states create that same alternative—or, even better, high quality courses offered by any provider that students have the option to take–the most resourceful students will select out top-notch courses that make them college-ready.

Indeed, colleges will have incentives to create those courses, so they know their applicants are, indeed, college-ready.

Will they create greater inequalities in educational opportunity?  Perhaps, in the first instance.  All progress in the first instance creates greater inequality. The first to drive cars were the rich, and they were able to get to the next town more quickly as a result. But, eventually, a lot of folks got the hang of driving an automobile.

Jesse Jackson had it right—rising tides lift all boats.  It can happen with electronic learning, too.




Comment on this article
  • Jaime L. Manzano says:

    Since education requirements and courses would become available on the internet for “free”, why not pay students for each course they passed? Why not award a voucher, say, worth 75 percent of per student costs in public school, to parents, allow them to home school their child using the internet, hold them accountable for performance of their child, and let them keep whatever they don’t spend? Parental involvement in education would increase, performance based on 0ne-to-one teaching would be enhanced, and the public schools would retain 25 percent of their budgets for use in their normal operations.

  • Comment on this Article

    Name ()


    *

         1 Comment
    Sponsored Results
    Sponsors

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform

    Sponsors