The Mystery that is Twelfth-Grade NAEP



By 05/09/2014

5 Comments | Print | NO PDF |

One of the great unanswered questions in American education policy is why the major gains we’ve seen on the Nation’s Report Card in the fourth and eighth grades evaporate once students reach the twelfth grade. The 2013 results, released yesterday, demonstrated this phenomenon yet again.

As with all NAEP results, nobody really knows why the scores are up, down, or flat. But when it comes to explaining the lack of meaningful progress at the high school level, here are the leading guesses:

*It’s because of our changing demographics. Schools are getting better, but they are facing the headwinds of an increasingly diverse student body. (As Hispanic students replace white students, their generally lower scores weigh down national averages.) That appears to be the case for math scores since 2005, where gains for whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians (all four percentage points or better) outstripped the more meager national average gain of three percentage points. This, however, was not the case for reading, where all subgroup scores are flat or, in the case of African Americans, down since 1992.
*It’s because of our increasing graduation rates. It’s true that our graduation rates have risen significantly in recent years, and it’s almost surely the case that the students who would have dropped out a decade ago but are now sticking it out to get their diplomas are among the lowest performing kids. They may be dragging down our scores.
*It’s because twelfth graders don’t try hard. Some studies indicate that this is a real problem, but I’ve never understood why this would get worse over time.

Those stabs at an answer all serve to explain away our flat scores. But there’s also the possibility that we’re seeing evidence of significant educational problems—namely, the following:

*Our high schools stink. This is the man-on-the-street explanation. We’re raising test scores in elementary and middle schools but not high schools? Duh, it’s because our high schools are terrible and have been largely untouched by reform. There’s surely some truth to that. Take testing and accountability, for example. Annual assessments stop in the eighth grade; teacher value-added scores aren’t generally computed at the high school level. Maybe high schools need some of the medicine we’ve been giving the rest of the system.
*We’re sacrificing long-term success for short-term gain. I find this argument intriguing and the most plausible. Simply put: E. D. Hirsch, Jr. is right. If you don’t help kids develop broad content knowledge, especially in elementary school, they will eventually hit a plateau with their reading ability. They will learn to decode and how to use various “comprehension strategies,” but they won’t become expert readers because they won’t be able to make sense of the texts they are encountering. And our practice of holding schools (and now teachers) accountable for year-to-year gains on reading tests only encourages them to focus on things that might get a short term bump (skills and strategies) and ignore the things that will make an impact over the long-term (such as content knowledge). It’s like companies who obsess over quarterly results to the detriment of long-term sustainability.

Let me be clear (lest I am accused of mis-NAEP-ery): I don’t know which, if any, of these explanations are on target. Graduate students: This is an area ripe for study. And Arne Duncan: If you want to do something constructive with your remaining eighteen months in office, how about empaneling a commission of smart people to try to figure this out? Such a fundamental aspect of our educational system—stagnation at the high school level—should not remain a mystery forever.

-Michael Petrilli




Comment on this article
  • Kristoffer Barikmo says:

    In my opinion, this will continue as long as we have a system that relies on high-stakes testing like the ACT/SAT, AP, etc. Strategies are great for helping your raise your ACT scores by a few points, or “getting a 5″ but there is never any content learned. We are doing a great job teaching our students to be algorithmic thinkers and spit out an answer, or eventually a “widget”. We are losing the art of learning and programming out of our students a desire to learn for learning’s sake.

  • Toady says:

    I would add also that the family structure has grown weaker over time. ie more broken families, more absent fathers etc …

  • James Thomas says:

    How does one assess without “high stakes” testing? There are a finite number of seats in top ranked universities. Would they be best allotted by lottery?

    Testing is an inevitable component of the educational process. The issue is making tests an accurate yardstick of the desired masteries.

    The focus of this article is flattening performance increases by the end of secondary education. Is it Mr. Barkimo’s argument that secondary teachers are poorer at ‘teaching to the test’ than are primary and middle school teachers?

  • Grant Wiggins says:

    Mike:

    The logic is flawed. How in the world is HS weakness explained by Hirsch’s argument? Hirsch knows next to nothing about HS reform, and the bulk of his message applies to grades 4 -8 anyway.

    I have spent 30 years in HS reform work and this has little to no bearing on the real issue of an institution that still is needlessly boring and depersonalized, in which teachers are badly isolated and overworked, and in which older kids see little value in delaying gratification endlessly for work that holds some vague promise of future benefit but limited value in the present. Please: read Goodlad’s A Place called School; Sizer’s work; Shopping Mall HS – all of which are still true; read the many books on the failure of urban HSs; look at the HS Study of Student Engagement; look at my work.

    I expect better from you, frankly.

  • Cindy Mann, L.C.S.W. says:

    My son is “white” “middle-class” and he dropped out of High School after sophmore year. I do not trust the statistics of increasing graduation levels. There are kids who are not being counted. My son was not counted as a drop-out.
    I am an educator (School Counselor/Licensed Clinical Social Worker) many units, enough for a Ph.D. lots in statistics.
    Our standardized testing is a statistical joke. Please stop blaming the kids and families. We are so far off target in the developmental psychology and the actual appropriateness of the teaching, testing, and curriculum at the present time. One must assume that there are forces that want us to fail. Public Education is being privatized just like the prison system.

  • Comment on this Article

    Name ()


    *

         5 Comments
    Sponsored Results
    Sponsors

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform

    Sponsors