Out of the Mainstream

Staying there isn’t easy
I spoke recently with a teacher at an alternative public high school. His students had been kicked out of their neighborhood schools for fighting, truancy, and drug abuse, and his job was to remedy the students’ behavior so they could return to their neighborhood schools. I wondered, what happened to the alternative school I remembered from the 1970s? It seemed so different from the alternative schools of today.
Alternative East High School in Wyncote, Pennsylvania, was modeled after the famous Parkway alternative school in Philadelphia. From 1971 to 1983, Alternative East drew students from Philadelphia and the surrounding suburban school districts of Abington, Cheltenham, and Springfield. The principal, Gisha Berkowitz, took the job after first becoming known as an “active parent.”
At Alternative East, students could create their own courses. As long as the course met college entry requirements, students could develop it, find a faculty member to teach it, and then advertise the class on a poster. If 15 students expressed interest, they could register for the course during master scheduling days held twice during the year. Students seldom sat in classrooms all day. Instead of looking at slides, for example, an art class piled into a van to visit local galleries.
Alternative East was continually evaluated and received positive reviews. Berkowitz carefully kept the budget from getting “out of balance.” So why did the school close?
As is often the case, the answer at the time was money. In 1983, Abington’s school board, in a 5–4 vote, withdrew the district’s participation, forcing the school to close its doors. Nevertheless, minutes from board meetings praised Alternative East and its programs, which included production of a children’s play at a local mall and learning activities in genetics. The board justified its decision by saying that district schools had “highly skilled, highly paid people, and we should be able to provide for the needs of these [students].”
The underlying causes were probably more deep-seated. Times had changed. When the school opened, according to Berkowitz, students were politically alienated by the Vietnam War, racial segregation, and traditional schooling. There was a passion for hands-on, personally relevant education. But by the 1980s, Berkowitz explained, the students at Alternative East were “less interested in exploring.” The teachers weren’t as enthusiastic either, and that sapped energy out of the school. “The political milieu has to be [there]—everything has to be ‘right’…and unfortunately, [that] doesn’t happen enough.”
Even the storied Parkway Program, which in 1970 Time magazine called “the most interesting high school in the U.S. today,” fell victim to the changing political climate. Parkway was known as the “school without walls,” because students learned about journalism at local newspapers, auto mechanics at auto shops, and art from museum historians. I spoke with Dr. Leonard Finkelstein, the second director of Parkway, who said that as a concept, Parkway was “magnificent.” But reality did not always match up to its promise. Some students thrived in the loosely structured environment, while it became a “free-for-all” for others.
Dr. James Lytle, Parkway’s first principal, said that by the late 1970s and early 1980s the middle-class students angry at the system had disappeared. Parkway became a safe alternative to the neighborhood schools and had to recruit “very aggressively” to maintain a diverse student population.
In 1990, the district asked Ms. Odette Harris to become Parkway’s principal. For more than 30 years, Harris had been the principal of William Penn, a large, traditional urban high school. Her style and Parkway’s had little in common, and she remained principal long enough to alter most things alternative. As Ms. Catherine Blunt, Parkway’s union representative at the time, put it, the school changed “because we were in the district.”
As districts like Philadelphia seek to “turn around” their public schools, let’s not forget the lesson of the lost alternative schools. Inventive programs, even when successful, are easily swept aside and replaced by standard fare.
Lynne Blumberg is an ESL and English instructor and freelance writer.
Comment on this article
Comment on this Article
Sponsored Results
Sponsors
Sign Up To Receive Notification
when the latest issue of Education Next is posted
In the meantime check the site regularly for new articles, blog postings, and reader comments


I was referred to this article and I have to respectfully disagree that the Wyncote Alternative School was a success, at last for those who intended to go to college. I attended for the first two years of the school — from ABington in the first incoming class slected by lottery, and it was a disaster. I recall staff tasked with evaluation, but that their so-called evaluations showed the school to be effective , to me, is totally nuts.
In brief, I went to college with a 10th grade education to the extent that it took my first three semesters to overcome.
Founder Allan Glatthorn bailed after Year One. I recall the “chemistry lab” being in the bathroom and learning nothing there or most other classes because of the misplaced emphasis on “student freedoms” — which most 16 year olds have yet to develop. I also recall moving to three separate locations in three years, from the Christian Brothers facility on Washinton Lane (now a housing development), to a building on Easton Road, followed by, finally, a big building on Greenwood Avenue in Jenkintown.
An easy class is known as a “gut class:; this was a gut school. I remember being asked to speak before the Abington School Board in 1982 to give my impression during the funding debate which, happily, ended this charade in about 1983. I declined, but was glad Abington pulled out, finally.
I can only speak for the first two years of this fiasco when I was a student; perhaps it improved over time to focus more on academics. But my time there was not well-spent, regardless of what so-called “evaluations” during that time may have found.
Richard Fischer
Alternative East
Class of 1973
I graduated AE with a lopsided education; slanted to my interests (art/photography/writing).
I regret not being involved in other classes but I will never forget the passion of my teachers, the unique manner in which classes were taught, & the environment (both physical & intellectual).
It wasn’t perfect. I suspect that students who craved a more academic style were uncomfortable there. (Why were they there in the first place?)
For me, it was a place that I looked forward to attending every day. Being that it took a bus AND a train to get to, it was worth it! The “alternative” to AE was getting a GED or just dropping out. My sending school (George Washington High in NE Philly) was like a prison. AE sent me on to a path in the Arts.
Steven Austin
Class of 1977