The Softer Side of ‘No Excuses’

Education Next Issue Cover

A view of KIPP schools in action



By , and

12 Comments | Print | PDF |

WINTER 2014 / VOL. 14, NO. 1

Since their start in Houston in 1994, KIPP (Knowledge Is Power Program) charter schools have been the most celebrated of the No Excuses schools. Employing strict discipline, an extended school day and year, and carefully selected teachers, No Excuses schools move disadvantaged students who start behind their peers academically up to and above grade level in reading and math, and on the path to success in college. Studies conducted by Mathematica Policy Research show that KIPP schools achieve significantly greater gains in student achievement than do traditional public schools teaching similar students. Recent large-scale research at Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) also finds that KIPP teaching is highly effective, with individual students learning far more than their statistical “twins” at traditional public schools. KIPP’s own studies find that the schools substantially increase the odds that a disadvantaged student will enter and graduate from college. Not surprisingly, the 144 KIPP charter schools across the nation have no shortage of fans, including President Barack Obama, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.

At KIPP Blytheville College Prep, students from the Class of 2020 dress up for “Stereotypical Geek Day,” which celebrates enjoying learning for its own sake. PHOTO / COURTESY OF KIPP BLYTHEVILLE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL.

Also not surprisingly, KIPP and other No Excuses schools have no shortage of critics. Furman University education professor P. L. Thomas, who admitted in a recent speech at the University of Arkansas to never having been in a No Excuses charter school, complains in a widely referenced 2012 Daily Kos post that in such schools, “Students are required to use complete sentences at all times, and call female teachers ‘Miss’—with the threat of disciplinary action taken if students fail to comply.” Regarding KIPP in particular, Cambridge College professor and blogger Jim Horn, who admits to having never been inside a KIPP school, nonetheless has referred to KIPP as a “New Age eugenics intervention at best,” destroying students’ cultures, and a “concentration camp” at worst.

Such criticisms could be dismissed if held on the margins of American public education. Unfortunately, within many education schools and teachers unions, KIPP detractors are more prevalent than KIPP backers. All too many professors and education administrators think that KIPP, and schools like it, succeed by working their students like dogs. Like all charter schools, KIPP schools are chosen by parents, but critics fear that disadvantaged parents do not know enough to choose wisely, or else do not have their children’s best interest at heart. Leaving aside whether the critics patronize the people of color KIPP schools serve, we propose that KIPP and similar schools are not nearly as militaristic as critics, who may have never been inside them, fear.

Inside a KIPP School

We have done hundreds of hours of fieldwork over the past eight years in 12 KIPP schools in five states, interviewing scores of teachers, students, and administrators. It is true that an atmosphere of order generally prevails. We found that schools that begin by establishing a culture of strict discipline, in neighborhoods where violence and disorder are widespread, ease off once a safe, tolerant learning environment is secured. “KIPPsters” and their teachers live up to the Work Hard, Be Nice motto but also play hard when the work is done. A schoolwide focus on academics is palpable. The schools nonetheless make time for band, basketball, chess, prom, and any number of clubs.

Third graders at KIPP McDonogh 15 work together on the first day of school to create posters that display the classroom rules. PHOTO / COURTESY OF KIPP McDONOGH 15

Student interactions are atypical. The KIPP schools we observed emphasize teamwork and assuring success for all (“team beats individual”; “all will learn“), encouraging more-advanced students to help their peers rather than just fend for themselves, in contrast to more individualistic traditional public schools.

Teachers in KIPP schools have to be willing to go the extra mile. We demonstrate in a forthcoming Social Science Quarterly article that in advertisements for teaching positions, KIPP schools consistently emphasize public service incentives, serving kids, while nearby traditional public schools emphasize private incentives, namely salary and benefits. One principal explained that KIPP’s New Orleans region hires teachers, in part, for “the J factor—Joy—enthusiasm and joy in learning, how to make learning fun; you were just in that classroom and could see that teacher had joy in the way he was leading the class.” If teachers don’t have it, then they probably can’t succeed at KIPP.

At KIPP McDonogh 15, a combined elementary and middle-school building in New Orleans’s French Quarter, the middle-school principal played music, and students and staff danced down the hallways as they moved from one class session to another. In the elementary school a floor below, some teachers took this concept a step further, using a lively musical transition from one lesson to another. Like most KIPP teachers elsewhere, teachers here constantly judge students, but their pronouncements are more positive than negative, as in, “I like how you stopped working as soon as I asked you,” and “I’ll shout out to you for helping your neighbor with that problem.”

Out of earshot of teachers, we talked with five elementary students. Though one boy said, “I liked my old school better; it was easier,” his peers preferred KIPP. Another boy said of his old school, “I was learning badly. Now I’m learning better.” One boy, who had been afraid in his old school, said, “I didn’t have any friends, and now I have lots of friends.” All the students we spoke to liked their KIPP teachers, teachers like Garrett Dorfman, a bespectacled 20-something in a #9 Drew Brees jersey, who looks older than his years but really comes alive in front of his 3rd graders. Although he originally planned to teach for just a few years, Dorfman is now hooked for life on New Orleans and on teaching at KIPP.

After finishing an engaging lesson in which students competed to see who could answer math questions the fastest, Dorfman called on one of us to answer his students’ questions about college, where they would all be in just 10 years. The students asked good questions about how to choose a college, how to pick a major, and the advantages of commuting as opposed to living on campus, until one student asked if most colleges did “celebration.” When asked what celebration is, the 3rd grader said we would have to stay after lunch, and then we could see. Dorfman ended class with a pep talk about the upcoming standardized tests:

I have this tough homework for you. Play with your friends. Get a good night’s sleep. I do have these 450 homework problems for you. [Class answers NO!]

Would you believe 450 pages’ worth? [Class answers NO!]

OK, the main thing is to come here next week on time at 7:40 sharp, because they won’t let you start the test late, with your game face on. Let’s see your game face. [They roar and he roars back.]

Remember that you can call me over the weekend if you need to. Now four shoutouts and go downstairs to celebration!

School Spirit, KIPP-Style

At celebration, held at McDonogh 15 most Friday afternoons, students played games devised by staff for a half hour, after which students who had no behavioral issues and who had won the lottery could hit any teacher or leader they chose with a pie. (Not coincidentally, Friday is casual-dress day at the school.) One mile away and four days later, a professor at the AERA (American Educational Research Association) annual conference denounced KIPP as a “concentration camp,” but to those of us who have been there, KIPP McDonogh 15 is about as far from a concentration camp as you can get.

At KIPP McDonogh 15, 3rd grade students present their posters to the rest of the class. PHOTO / COURTESY OF KIPP McDONOGH 15

Not all KIPP schools manage the school day in exactly the same way. On a day-to-day basis, the KIPP Delta schools in Arkansas are a little stricter than the KIPP schools in New Orleans: the network varies across communities more than critics or supporters realize. But even at KIPP Delta, teachers may not survive the day without getting a pie to the face. We spent two days observing at KIPP Blytheville College Preparatory School (BCPS) in Blytheville, Arkansas, in March 2013 during Geek Week. Each March at KIPP BCPS, students participate in a week of activities similar to Spirit Week in traditional public schools. Geek Week included Pattern Day, where students mismatched different patterns on their clothing; Superhero Day, where students dressed as their favorite superhero; and Geriatric Day, where students dressed like the elderly. The festivities culminated with Pi Day, on March 14 (3.14). On Pi Day, students were given an information sheet about the number pi, noting its history and function in mathematics. The sheet included a mirror image of the number 3.14, which looked like the letters P, I, and E.

A general air of excitement preceded the Pi Challenge, in which students competed to see who could recite the most digits of pi, followed by the chance to hit a teacher with a pie. Student surveys picked the three “meanest” teachers in the school to “pie,” along with school director Maisie Wright, and they in turn got to honor, or dishonor, three students with pies in the face, perhaps students who had overcome great challenges, or who gave them the most grief. Prior to the main event of pies to the face, the assembled KIPPsters cheered on their classmates in the Pi Challenge. The cafeteria-turned-temporary-auditorium was hushed as one student after another recited the digits and Ms. Wright checked the numbers. One student in the audience looked on with baited breath, a 7th grader who held the school pi record at 186. This young woman had moved out of state, returning to KIPP Blytheville during her spring break to see if her record would indeed be broken. A valiant effort was made by all competitors, but in the end, a girl in 6th grade won the crown for the day by reciting 158 digits of pi without tripping up. After the Pi Challenge, one by one, starting with a countdown from 5…4…3…2…1, the participating teachers and students smashed pie plates of whipped cream into each other’s faces. The student assembly, which had remained seated and mostly quiet, was now in an uproar, with high-fives, hooting, hollering, cheering, even jumping up and down, as they watched their teachers and KIPP “teammates” getting pied.

Third-grade teacher Garrett Dorfman gets “pied” in the face during celebration at KIPP McDonogh 15. PHOTO / COURTESY OF KIPP McDONOGH 15

Prior to Geek Week at BCPS, we observed a lock-in event cleverly named Benchmark Madness, after the Arkansas Benchmark tests to be administered in a month’s time. We were surprised when a teacher rolled into a cafeteria full of quietly seated students on a scooter, in his pajamas, complete with matching bathrobe and house shoes, spraying students with Silly String and Nerf gun darts.

Inside and outside the classroom, students are encouraged to work together. That evening, students enjoyed numerous team-building events uniting students, faculty, staff, and parent volunteers. Students participated in a variety of activities. Walking from room to room, students could be seen tie-dyeing shirts, building clay sculptures, singing karaoke, building forts, and attempting to best each other in word games. These activities mostly took place in classrooms or at stations outside, through which small groups of students would rotate. Once students had made complete rotations through the teacher-led activities, the students would return to the cafeteria for an Hour of Power.

The first Hour of Power consisted of students learning song parodies that were focused on strategies and motivation to do well in school and on the upcoming Benchmarks. Students belted out the lyrics of a song titled “Beat That Benchmark Test.” A nonstop dance party held from midnight to 1 a.m. was the second Hour of Power. The final Hour of Power took place at 5 a.m. Using the light of the rising sun, the students followed a few teachers on a morning jog around campus. At the end, other teachers positioned on top of the school buildings bombarded students with water balloons.

While none of these activities seemed to be related to the specific items that students would soon face on the benchmark exam, it was obvious that teamwork and leadership were being developed. Students relied on and supported one another as they traveled from one activity to the next with a great deal of autonomy from their teachers and responsibility for keeping up with all of their group members. In the end, the purposes of Benchmark Madness were to have fun and to motivate students in their battle to dominate standardized tests.

As KIPP Delta director Scott Shirey put it, the state benchmark exam is the enemy that unites students and faculty: “If it didn’t exist, we would have to create it.”

Seventh-grade students at KIPP BCPS wear matching t-shirts as they celebrate Pi Day, held each year on March 14th. PHOTO / COURTESY OF KIPP BLYTHEVILLE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL.

The Takeaways

Of course, these are just a few days in the life of these KIPP schools. Typical times are more mundane. Even so, from what we have seen, KIPP schools are successful high-poverty schools. Teachers and kids have good days and bad days. Many kids have troubled home lives, which make schooling more challenging and require that school staff be flexible and accommodate changing student needs. The toughest times in KIPP schools are when the schools are new and the Work Hard, Be Nice culture is being established. Principals and teachers have to set up the goals of the school clearly and gain student buy-in through constant feedback, both positive and negative. Once basic safety and a college-bound culture are established, KIPPsters and their teachers get down to the daily tasks of teaching and learning. But they can also have fun. There may be more opportunity for fun than at most schools, since KIPP schools seem to have less bullying, no competition over clothes, and students who share the goals of getting ahead academically and helping their peers do the same.

Our extensive fieldwork shows that in contrast to the claims of some KIPP backers, there is no magic. In contrast to the claims of KIPP detractors, there is no ill treatment of children. There is lots of hard work and hard play, led by teachers and administrators who, at most KIPP schools, know every kid and every family. Traditional public schools can copy nearly all of the KIPP playbook, if they wish to try. If doing so establishes a culture of cooperation and academic success among students, teachers, and parents, would that be such a bad thing?

 

Alexandra M. Boyd is doctoral academy fellow in the department of education reform at the University of Arkansas, where Robert Maranto is professor of education reform. Caleb Rose teaches in a dropout recovery charter school in Little Rock.




Comment on this article
  • P. L. Thomas says:

    It seems likely if you misrepresent in order to make your case, readers should be skeptical of what may be a valuable contribution.

    My “recent” talk at UA was October of 2012, where I admitted to not having visited any KIPP schools in Arkansas—which is not what you state in this piece.

    Also, I have addressed the problem (which I have admitted as a problem for my own work) about KIPP be chosen by parents by connecting “no excuses” schools with the New Jim Crow:

    I explain in the piece for Truthout (http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/16406-education-reform-in-the-new-jim-crow-era):

    This last point – that African Americans seem to support both the war on crime and “no excuses” charter schools – presents the most problematic aspect of charges that mass incarceration and education reform are ultimately racist, significant contributions to the New Jim Crow.

    For example, Carr reports that African American parents not only choose “no excuses” charter schools in New Orleans, but also actively cheer and encourage the authoritarian policies voiced by the schools’ administrators. But Alexander states, “Given the dilemma facing poor black communities, it is inaccurate to say that black people ‘support’ mass incarceration or ‘get-tough’ policies” because “if the only choice that is offered blacks is rampant crime or more prisons, the predictable (and understandable) answer will be ‘more prisons.’ ” (p. 210)

    But your last paragraph completely stretches credibility with “there is no ill treatment of children.” None?

    Are you discounting works such as HOPE AGAINST HOPE, which clearly details problems with how children are treated in KIPP/”no excuses” schools?

  • Jim Horn says:

    First of all, dogs could never be trained to work like KIPP teachers and students, even though dogs and children do respond similarly to the same learned helplessness techniques that KIPP uses to subdue urban black and brown children.

    I agree with you that KIPP teachers should have, indeed, lots of “joy” if they are to survive their one to two years that the vast majority put in before all their joy is sucked out by a work regimen that humans cannot sustain.

    And I did not say at AERA or elsewhere that KIPP schools are concentration camps, even though I did reference concentration camps in response to the question as to whether or not I have ever visited a KIPP school. I said, no, in fact, I have not, nor have I ever visited a WWII concentration camp. But the documentation is clear what it was like there (despite the Holocaust deniers), just as it is clear what life is like in a KIPP school–despite your propaganda piece that tries to paint a picture of a kinder, gentler form of chain gang, total lockdown schooling.

    My new book on KIPP will be out in 2014. I hope you will look for it.

  • marian dondero says:

    Your extensive field research and observations produced interesting insights. Thanks for the efforts!

  • James Clark says:

    I notice that people describe basic behavior modification (IE. telling students what they are doing correct instead of what they are doing incorrect, focusing on the good instead of the bad…) as some kind of innovation. I have been public school teacher for 14 years and have never seen a teacher not use positive reinforcement… Ever. This is nothing new and KIPP does not have monopoly on positive re-direction. I believe its taught in most 100 level psyche classes- a requirement for college graduation in most universities. However having talked to former KIPP teacher or two I have heard they do take the “J” factor a contrived extreme. The question that I have is what kind of a teacher is this creating? If what you are speaks louder than what you say, and teachers are inadvertently encouraged to be unreal, “We’re happy, happy, happy, all the time!”

  • Russ Walsh says:

    I have visited a “No excuses school. I discuss what I found here. By any measure of appropriate discipline for middle school discipline, what I saw was out of line and abusive.

    http://russonreading.blogspot.com/2013/10/colonialism-in-inner-city-charter_6.html

  • Miss Miller says:

    To quote a critic:

    “Students are required to use complete sentences at all times, and call female teachers ‘Miss’—with the threat of disciplinary action taken if students fail to comply.”

    OH NO! Required to use proper language and be respectful of teachers? That is terrible! How dare those KIPP teachers.

    Perhaps they should just pass trophies out to all the kids, instead, no matter how they speak or behave.

  • Catherine M. Ionata says:

    The authors did hundreds of hours of fieldwork, allowing them to barely scratch the surface of the life and culture of a school. I worked in a “no excuses” charter school for 5 years. Call it thousands of hours of “fieldwork”. I also have experience at non-charter schools to use as comparison.

    The school was not in the KIPP network, but rather part of a large charter management organization that is very similar to KIPP, uses many of KIPP’s ideas and slogans (including “The ‘J’ Factor”). The charter world is incredibly insular. For example, we had the EXACT same “pi day” celebration at our school as described above.

    While there were fun moments, in general, the discipline systems were ineffective and inappropriate. Only top performing children (who entered the school highly disciplined) ended up participating in special events like Pi Day. On more ordinary days, children were penalized if they failed to make eye contact with the teacher, if they touched a wall while walking in the hallway, if they said “excuse me” when they bumped into another student during “silent time”. Teachers who tried to use logic and differentiation (rather than a rigid one-sized fits all system) for discipline were told this “might not be the school for them”, as they were “not on board”. Several were fired for attempting to differentiate management systems for special education students.

    I had taught for 7 years in a regular public school before coming to the charter. Through positive relationships, clear (sane) rules, and *flexible* systems, I had created safe, fun, orderly classroom environments year after year. I rarely had to ask students to look my in the eye while I was speaking; the respect was there because they knew I respected them as well.

    At the charter school, kids had absorbed the notion that all behavior is about “compliance” and “avoiding punishment”. When asked why they look at the speaker, kids at the charter typically told me “so we don’t get in trouble”. I struggled to get the kids to do so much as make eye contact. If a behavior wasn’t tied to a punishment or a reward, they weren’t doing it. All decisions had been taken away from them. There was the “system” that made all the choices. I had never seen so many children so unable to think for themselves, or exhibit real self-control. They had never been given the chance.

    Some students who had trouble fidgeting or maintaining eye contact told me that their minds were always on “how to stay out of trouble”. This was obvious, as they struggled more to complete their work than any children I had ever met. The charter kids were more focused on “getting the right answer” than the non-charter public school kids, who had been allowed to focus on the process of learning. Test scores at my charter, like at KIPP, are all-important. The lesson for children: it doesn’t matter if you understand the material — just bubble in the right answer. Of course, this was unintentional. But go ahead and stress high test scores with young children and then try to tell them learning is a lifelong process and intelligence is malleable. The mixed messages don’t work.

    A culture of “cooperation and academic success?” What I saw from a school that DID copy nearly all of KIPP’s playbook (literally) was a culture of fear. Fear of “getting in trouble” and fear of the getting “the wrong answer”. Neither of these is conducive to learning. Let’s hope other school’s DON’T take a page from *this* playbook.

  • Robert D. Skeels says:

    Catherine M. Ionata describes the no excuses facet of the charter sector as a “a culture of fear.”

    Which is, of course, the overarching goal of those that fund this publication. Keeping working class people, particularly those of color, obedient and subservient is what KIPP and its backers are all about.

  • Silas Kulkarni says:

    I taught at a KIPP school for 3 years and at another no excuses charter in Harlem after that. I’m constantly shocked by the degree of uninformed vitriol that is thrown at KIPP schools, and the number of bizarre conspiracy theories about the motives of those involved. P.L. Thomas says they are part and parcel of a new Jim Crow and mass incarceration. Robert D. Skeels says that our primary motive is keeping black and brown people (a group of which I am a member) subservient and obedient. And Jim Horn compares our schools to concentration camps, saying you don’t have to visit them to know how evil they are.

    Your hyperbole and assumptions about other people’s motives undermine your own credibility. I’ve never heard of a concentration camp where numerous “inmates” later come back and thank their “jailers” for helping them succeed in life, though years later, I have received many such calls. Large numbers of them are now attending college, at much greater rates than their friends and peers who didn’t go to schools like ours. I run into my former students or their parents on the street frequently and they greet me warmly and tell me about how they are doing in school. Do you assume that we’ve somehow brainwashed all these people into believing there lives have been made better by our schools, and that you, their “true advocate”, know what’s better for them, than they themselves?

    The part that is so upsetting about these hateful critiques is the assumption about our motives. Every teacher I taught with and principals I worked with, worked their butts off because they cared about the students and their families. I myself chose to teach in the first place because of a passionate commitment to civil rights and equal opportunity, and I chose to teach in a no-excuses charter, because they seemed to me the schools achieving the best results for disadvantaged students. Is this really so different from those teaching in other types of schools? How dare you paint people you don’t know in the least with such a broad brush, and make so little of the causes and children we’ve devoted our lives to?

    It is legitimate to disagree with a given discipline policy or curricular choice. It’s even better to point out approaches that work better towards the same ends. But it is totally illegitimate, counterproductive, and dishonorable to make judgmental assumptions about the motives of people doing their best they know how to help disadvantaged communities. Got off your high horse and get in the classroom. Then let’s have a civil discussion about what works and what doesn’t for the students who need a great education the most.

  • Jim Horn says:

    Mr. Kulkarni, you may be surprised to learn that your cultural blackness does not earn you a lifetime membership in the non-racist club. Black scholars, including Angela Davis, have long warned about the dangers of conflating cultural blackness with anti-racism practices. And even though you may not be a racist, yourself, your participation in a deeply racist institution speaks for itself.

    Some children who have lived through KIPPnotizing and KIPP’s other soul crushing practices (a former teacher’s term, not mine) may have suffered Stockholm Syndrome as a result of years of total compliance schooling. If so, they would quite naturally see you as a role model and someone actually to emulate.

    Having interviewed former KIPP teachers, I have no doubt that they all had good intentions and good work ethics, but most came to understand that their good intentions could not coexist with this institution. And after all, we know what the road to hell is paved with.

    The effects of KIPP’s racist practices and assumptions do not have intentional to be effectively racist. The cultural sterilization model that KIPP uses and the celebration of a white privileged individualistic mythology helps to create in children a false sense that if they do not make it out of poverty or if they do not live up to KIPP’s expectations, it is no one’s fault but their own.

    There is no excuse, nor can there be, for adults who inculcate this kind of self-serving dangerous nonsense that psychologically hobbles children who don’t make it at KIPP, and for many who do make it through, only to find themselves entirely unprepared for the demands of higher education that require independent thought and cooperative learning.

  • I tried to post a comment some time ago and apparently failed to negotiate the system, and so with the help of Education Next am trying again. First off, I want to say that I respect Paul Thomas. Unlike some of the profit seeking prophets who collect large speaking fees while insisting that it is all for the children, Paul gave a talk here at the University of Arkansas for free, and graciously took questions for quite some time afterward. I think that Paul really does care about kids. I accept Paul’s insistence that he does not intend to supplant his notions of proper schooling for those of the disadvantaged parents who are choosing KIPP and similar schools. I may well have misinterpreted his views as patronizing, and I apologize.

    That said, Paul did issue summary judgments of KIPP and similar schools without having visited those schools, nor appreciating the now very substantial empirical scholarship from places like Rand and Mathematica on matters such as student academic growth, student turnover, and later college persistence. Obviously, I will call him and others on this.

    So here is what I propose: let’s propose a debate on KIPP and like schools at the 2015 AERA. Could be fun!

  • Comment on this Article

    Name ()


    *

         12 Comments
    Sponsored Results
    Sponsors

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform

    Sponsors