What We’re Watching: Good Teachers Boost Students’ Future Pay



By Education Next 05/11/2012

1 Comment | Print | NO PDF |

Harvard professor John Friedman talks with the Wall Street Journal about the study he did (with Raj Chetty and Jonah Rockoff) on the effects a high-value-added teacher can have on students’ future earnings.

A reader-friendly version of the study, “Great Teaching: Measuring its effects on students’ future earnings,” by Friedman, Chetty and Rockoff, appears in the Summer 2012 edition of Education Next.

Because the study generated a great deal of attention, Education Next asked four experts to comment on the study’s implications for public policy. Here are their responses:

Low-Performing Teachers Have High Costs - By Eric A. Hanushek

Profound Implications for State Policy - By Chris Cerf and Peter Shulman

More Evidence Would Be Welcome - By Dale Ballou

Implications for Policy Are Not So Clear - By Douglas Harris




Comment on this article
  • Jeffrey Miller says:

    Key data point from the Cerf and Shulman link:

    “.. and students assigned to such high value-added teachers are more likely to go to college, earn higher incomes, and less likely to be teenage mothers. On average, having such a teacher for one year raises a child’s cumulative lifetime income by $50,000 (equivalent to $9,000 in present value at age 12 with a 5% interest rate).”

    Over a LIFETIME. That’s all? I wonder, how many other variables might happen in a child’s life that might account for far more or less, income earnings?

    Bueller?

  • Comment on this Article

    Name ()


    *

         1 Comment
    Sponsored Results
    Sponsors

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform

    Sponsors