Why Are Elite Colleges More Selective Than Ever?

By 03/26/2013

3 Comments | Print | NO PDF |

Anyone who knows a teenager understands how hard it is to get into a good college these days. We’ve all heard of some bright eighteen-year-old with a stellar GPA, sky-high SAT scores, fives on a half-dozen AP courses, and a service record like Mother Theresa’s who still couldn’t manage to get into her university of choice. (Colleges mail acceptance letters this week.) What gives?

It’s particularly mysterious since national and international exams keep telling us that American high schoolers aren’t, by and large, making any significant achievement gains. Yet when it comes time to apply to college, the crème-de-la-crème appear to be rising further to the top. As proof, see this chart below. It shows, for the nation’s fifty most selective institutions,* the SAT scores that put one at the 25th percentile of the freshman class (in other words, toward the lower range of what it takes to get into these schools).

Click to enlarge

One possible explanation for this phenomenon is simple supply and demand. The demographic bulge known as the Baby Boom Echo has made its way through our high schools and into college in recent years. The supply of seats at elite colleges hasn’t increased (much to these schools’ discredit), yet demand for those seats—from well-prepared students—has gone up significantly. And that’s because there are simply more students to begin with (about a million more students per class than when I graduated high school in 1991).

To test that hypothesis, I charted the birth rate for the U.S., with an eighteen-year lag. Here’s what that looks like:

Click to enlarge

My demographic explanation looks plausible, at least through 2008 or so. From 1984 through 1990, we mostly see a steady rise in births and in elite SAT scores eighteen years later. Then births decrease, and SAT scores take a hit. But then something strange happens: Births continue to decline, but SAT scores at these colleges start to rise again. How come?

Could immigration explain it? Are foreign-born students making up for the drop in American-born kids? One way to see is by looking at the number of students graduating from high school rather than births. But as you can see below, it shows the same pattern: strong growth peaking around 2006, then a steady decline.

Click to enlarge

So what’s the answer? Honestly, I’m stumped. Here are some possibilities:

• Perhaps more of our best students are gunning for these top schools. There’s certainlyevidence that going to top-rated colleges does you more good in life than going to the ordinary kind (in terms of job prospects, grad school admissions, earnings, etc.). And applications to top schools have certainly risen sharply.

• Perhaps these top colleges are putting a greater focus on SAT scores, especially after the Supreme Court limited their ability to perform race-based affirmative action.

• Maybe American students—at least our best ones—really are learning more. (Scores on Advanced Placement exams are rising.)

• Or perhaps international students (a growing share of university student bodies) are driving up SAT averages.

If you can solve this mystery, the comments section is open.

* As defined by those with the highest SAT scores at the 25th percentile in 2002.

—Mike Petrilli

This entry originally appeared on the Fordham Institute’s Flypaper blog.

Comment on this article
  • David D. says:

    Michael, do you have SAT score chart for 50th and 75th percentiles too? Would it be possible to publish them too?


  • L'Angelo Misterioso says:

    No doubt that top schools are placing greater emphasis on SAT scores. We learned that the hard way when two of our children, both top-top H.S. students but simply above average in SATs, were skunked by classmates much farther down in class rankings but with higher scores.

    The other aspect to this phenomenon is pure illusion. The normal distribution of intelligence and/or accomplishment remains relatively constant over time. But between honors classes with inflated grades, a greater emphasis on “leadership” and community activities, overall dumbing down of H.S. curricula, and general grade inflation, more students *appear* to be Ivy League material.

    They are not.

    I attended H.S. from 1968 to 1972. Perfect GPAs were achieved once in a while, but not over the entire four years. Our algebra class covered in one year what is typically taught over two years today, in “honors” classes no less.

  • Mark Johnson says:

    While both of my children are post-college now and didn’t attend “top-50″ schools, (more like “top-100″) I think this being driven primarily by choice “A.” There is some evidence that attending a good college exposes a young person to somewhat better faculty and smarter peers. This translates into a better overall college experience and a potential for networking as careers unfold. Improved knowledge of these phenomena results in increased demand for the product. It is not necessarily a bad thing.

  • Comment on this Article

    Name ()


    Sponsored Results

    The Hoover Institution at Stanford University - Ideas Defining a Free Society

    Harvard Kennedy School Program on Educational Policy and Governance

    Thomas Fordham Institute - Advancing Educational Excellence and Education Reform