Published Articles & Media
Is there a federal constitutional right to education?
As a matter of constitutional law, Rodriguez was correctly decided.
Is court involvement in school spending essential to reform, or can we use education funding to drive reforms that promise better outcomes for students?- Since 2005, there have been important adequacy case decisions in over a dozen states, and in none of them have the courts required further funding increases. Several courts, when deciding new adequacy cases, have either dismissed them based on separation of powers grounds or have ruled against the plaintiffs on the merits following a trial.
- One sleeper in the flurry of decisions at the end of the last U.S. Supreme Court term has to be the decision in Horne v. Flores, a long-running Arizona case about funding special programs for English Language Learners (ELL). In overturning lower court decisions calling for continued court-ordered school spending without regard to student outcomes, the Court may lead to a new era of more rational and effective court involvement in school funding policies.
NEWSLETTER
Notify Me When Education Next
Posts a Big Story
Business + Editorial Office
Program on Education Policy and Governance
Harvard Kennedy School
79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
Phone (617) 496-5488
Fax (617) 496-4428
Email Education_Next@hks.harvard.edu
For subscription service to the printed journal
Phone (617) 496-5488
Email subscriptions@educationnext.org
Discover
Copyright © 2025 President & Fellows of Harvard College